SPECIAL REPORT :: TRANSFUSIONS
environment, human, machine, and task. Although this article focused on trauma patients, the strategies could be theoretically incorporated into any hospital’s MTP program with regularity, including guidance, evaluation, drills, and feedback.21
Conclusion
An MTP requires an all-hands-on-deck approach in the hospital blood bank as well as in the patient care areas. In interdepartmental approach is necessary to provide timely product delivery and immediate care for the patient to ensure the best chance at positive patient outcomes. Since all patients are unique, the science is not fully understood, and all hospitals do not have the same resources, diagnostic tools and equipment. Current research shows that it may not be feasible to have a fully standardized MTP throughout the U.S.24 In addition, little research has been performed to predict which patients may bleed, or measure patient outcomes after receiving a MTP. Although MTPs can be partially standardized in the blood bank with regard to the kinds and amounts of blood products used, it is clear that more research is needed to determine if a fully standardized transfusion approach for MTPs is feasible in this country, given that there are many uncontrollable, yet important, variables to consider.
REFERENCES
1. Farooq N, Galiatsatos P, Aulakh JK, et al. Massive transfusion practice in non-trauma related hemorrhagic shock. J Crit Care. 2018 Feb; 43:65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.033. Epub 2017 Aug 24. PubMed PMID: 28846895.
2. Allen CJ, Shariatmadar S, Meizoso JP, et al. Liquid plasma use during “super” massive transfusion protocol. J Surg Res. 2015 Dec;199(2):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jun 18. PubMed PMID: 26182996.
3. Moren AM, Hamptom D, Diggs B, et al. PROMMTT Study Group. Recur- sive partitioning identifies greater than 4 U of packed red blood cells per hour as an improved massive transfusion definition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Dec;79(6):920-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000830. PubMed PMID: 26680135; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4778543.
4. Rajasekhar A, Gowing R, Zarychanski R, et al. Survival of trauma patients after massive red blood cell transfusion using a high or low red blood cell to plasma transfusion ratio. Crit Care Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1507- 13. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eb517. Review. PubMed PMID: 21336132.
5. Callcut RA, Cotton BA, Muskat P, et al. PROMMTT Study Group. Defining when to initiate massive transfusion: a validation study of indi- vidual massive transfusion triggers in PROMMTT patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jan;74(1):59-65, 67-8; discussion 66-7. doi: 10.1097/ TA.0b013e3182788b34. PubMed PMID: 23271078; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3771339.
6. Chambers LA, Chow SJ, Shaffer LE. Frequency and characteristics of coagulopathy in trauma patients treated with a low- or high-plasma-con- tent massive transfusion protocol. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Sep;136(3):364-70. doi: 10.1309/AJCPH16YXJEFSHEO. PubMed PMID: 21846911.
7. Holcomb JB, del Junco DJ, Fox EE, et al. PROMMTT Study Group. The prospective, observational, multicenter, major trauma transfusion (PROM- MTT) study: comparative effectiveness of a time-varying treatment with competing risks. JAMA Surg. 2013 Feb;148(2):127-36. PMID:23560283
8. D’Alton, Mary E. MD; Main, Elliott K. MD; Menard, M, et al. The National Partnership for Maternal Safety. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 123(5):973-977, May
2014.PMID: 24785848 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000219
9. Treml AB, Gorlin JB, Dutton RP, et al. Massive Transfusion Protocols: A Survey of Academic Medical Centers in the United States. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):277-281. PubMed PMID: 27749352.
10. Gregory JA, Huitron SS, George AA, Simon CD. Optimizing Transfusion Ratios in Massive Transfusion Protocols: An Argument Against the 1:1:1 Dogma and Approach to Trauma Resuscitation. Lab Med. 2015 Spring;46(2): e46-52. doi: 10.1309/LMJQNOQCFG4GKQRJ. PubMed PMID: 26169658.
Colleen Hinrichsen, MT(ASCP) SBBCM, serves as transfusion medicine supervisor at Penn Medicine Princeton Medical Center in NJ. Colleen has worked at both large university and medium-sized community hospitals, and in a blood donation center. She has served as an AABB Assessor, has helped build and implement a blood bank LIS, and has served as board member and past president of a state blood banking association.
MLO-ONLINE.COM JULY 2019 59
11. Ho AM, Holcomb JB, Ng CS, et al. The traditional vs “1:1:1” approach debate on massive transfusion in trauma should not be treated as a dichotomy. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;33(10):1501-4. doi:10.1016/j. ajem.2015.06.065. Epub 2015 Jun 27. PubMed PMID: 26184524.
12. Coleman JR, Moore EE, Samuels JM, et al. Trauma Resuscita- tion Considerations: Sex Matters, Journal of the American College of Surgeons (2019), doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.01.009
13. Baumann Kreuziger LM, Morton CT, Subramanian AT, et al. Not only in trauma patients: hospital-wide implementation of a massive transfu- sion protocol. Transfus Med. 2014 Jun;24(3):162-8. doi: 10.1111/tme.12096. Epub 2013 Dec 26. PubMed PMID: 24372790; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4043857.
14. Nascimento B, Callum J, Tien H, et al. Effect of a fixed-ratio (1:1:1) transfusion protocol versus laboratory-results-guided transfusion in patients with severe trauma: a randomized feasibility trial. CMAJ. 2013 Sep 3;185(12): E583-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121986. Epub 2013 Jul 15. PubMed PMID: 23857856; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3761040.
15. Fung MK, Eder AF, Spitalnik SL, et al. AABB Technical Manual, 19th edi- tion 2017 p. 478, 517.
16. McDaniel LM, Etchill EW, Raval JS, Neal MD. State of the art: massive transfusion. Transfus Med. 2014 Jun;24(3):138-44. doi: 10.1111/tme.12125. Review. PubMed PMID: 24889805.
17. Etchill E, Sperry J, Zuckerbraun B, et al. The confusion continues: results from an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma survey on massive transfusion practices among United States trauma centers. Transfusion. 2016 Oct;56(10):2478-2486. doi: Aug 11. PubMed PMID: 27515056.
10.1111/trf.13755. Epub 2016
18. Meyer DE, Vincent LE, Fox EE, et al. Every minute counts: Time to delivery of initial massive transfusion cooler and its impact on mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001531. PubMed PMID: 28452870; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5526458.
19. Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Karamanos E, et al. The survival impact of plasma to red blood cell ratio in massively transfused non-trauma patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Jun;43(3):393-398. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0674- 5. Epub 2016 Apr 27. PubMed PMID: 27117790.
20. Broxton S, Medeiros R, Abuzeid A, et al. Implementation of a Massive Transfusion Protocol: Evaluation of Its Use and Efficacy. J Trauma Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;25(2):92-97. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000350. PubMed PMID: 29521775.
21. Enticott JC, Jeffcott S, Ibrahim JE, et al. A review on decision sup- port for massive transfusion: understanding human factors to support the implementation of complex interventions in trauma. Transfusion. 2012 Dec;52(12):2692-705. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03648.x. Epub 2012 Apr 15. Review. PubMed PMID: 22500470.
22. Rahbar MH, Fox EE, del Junco DJ, et al. PROMMTT Investigators. Coordination and management of multicenter clinical studies in trauma: Experience from the PRospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) Study. Resuscitation. 2012 Apr;83(4):459-64. doi: 10.1016/
j.resuscitation.2011.09.019. Epub 2011 Oct 12. PubMed PMID: 22001613; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3303947.
23. Holcomb JB, Fox EE, Wade CE. PROMMTT Study Group. The PRospec- tive Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1 Suppl 1):S1-2. doi: 10.1097/ TA.0b013e3182983876. PubMed PMID: 23778505.
24. Gorlin JB, Peters J, Van Buren N, et al. The confusion continues: evolving nature of massive transfusion protocol practice may reflect lack of evidence to support a single solution that fits all. Transfusion. 2017 May;57(5):1322-1324. doi: 10.1111/trf.14090. PubMed PMID: 28425601.
25. Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, et al. Obstetrics & Gynecology: August 2017. Volume 130 - Issue 2 - p 366–373 doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002114.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72
